What do you think about "IP-Adapter-FaceID?

[alpozdemir]

What do you think about "IP-Adapter-FaceID? Is Reactor considering support for this technique?

[Gourieff]

Hi, yes, this is rather good technique! And I have in plans to implement its support

[alpozdemir]

Hi Gourieff, please check RestoreFormer++ too. Not too bad :)

[Tangerie]

I tried out a little pipeline last night, and it seemed that RestoreFormer++ worked great to remove noise and motion blur from source images. (Used the source images for FaceIDPlus and then Reactor)

[Soulreaver90]

I actually have been using both to enhance the subject. I think there are use cases where one would be preferred, but using both also has benefits. The more the merrier!

[alpozdemir]

Hi there,
I tried Ip-Adapter. The results are truly impressive. So, it could really work if it had IP-Adapter support.

[Gourieff]

The best result (for similarity) is to combine FaceID+IP-Adapter+ReActor (with not to much weights of FaceID and IP-Adapter or the final quality of the image will be reduced)

[alpozdemir]

these can be parametric

[drnod]

Awesome to hear that this will maybe included.

Parameters to choose would be great. So there can be experimenting with balance of each method and find best values.