You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Clean and robust accuracy: {clean:87.67%, AutoAttack: 60.65%}
Architecture: {WideResNet-34-15}
Description of the model/defense:
’‘’
Dear authors of AutoAttack:
This is an update for our last submission in #21. Here we report our new best results and hope to replace it with the current one on the table (the 4th one). We also change our title from "Does Network Width Really Help Adversarial Robustness?" to "Do Wider Neural Networks Really Help Adversarial Robustness?". Please update this information for us on the RobustBench too.
Thanks!
Boxi Wu
‘’‘
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
tabrisweapon
changed the title
Add [defense name]
Width-Adjusted-Regularization Update
Jan 6, 2021
Paper: { http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01279 }
Venue: {unpublished}
Dataset and threat model: {CIFAR-10, l-inf, eps=8/255, AutoAttack}
Code: {Same with the last report}
Pre-trained model: {https://www.dropbox.com/s/89i5zoxa2ugglaq/wrn-34-15-cad59.pt?dl=0 }
Log file: {None}
Additional data: {yes}
Clean and robust accuracy: {clean:87.67%, AutoAttack: 60.65%}
Architecture: {WideResNet-34-15}
Description of the model/defense:
’‘’
Dear authors of AutoAttack:
This is an update for our last submission in #21. Here we report our new best results and hope to replace it with the current one on the table (the 4th one). We also change our title from "Does Network Width Really Help Adversarial Robustness?" to "Do Wider Neural Networks Really Help Adversarial Robustness?". Please update this information for us on the RobustBench too.
Thanks!
Boxi Wu
‘’‘
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: