Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fuzzing #702

Open
cospectrum opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Fuzzing #702

cospectrum opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@cospectrum
Copy link
Contributor

What do you think about adding fuzzers similar to image crate?
@ripytide
Copy link
Member

ripytide commented Jan 3, 2025

It would be a nice feature and might catch some bugs, but it would also add a maintenance burden, one I'm not sure is sustainable.

@theotherphil
Copy link
Contributor

I’m sure we could find some issues via fuzzing, but I’m not sure what a good fuzzing approach would be here - the image fuzzers look to just be for format parsing, which is the “easy” case for setting up a fuzzer harness.

@cospectrum
Copy link
Contributor Author

cospectrum commented Jan 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

For example, TensorFlow python fuzzers use input bytes for shape only, values taken from RNG.

@cospectrum cospectrum reopened this Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@theotherphil @ripytide @cospectrum