Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify in README that Policy configuration is not a CRD #1561

Open
Zalastax opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Clarify in README that Policy configuration is not a CRD #1561

Zalastax opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.

Comments

@Zalastax
Copy link

There have been multiple issues reported that there is no DeschedulerPolicy CRD.
As explained by @a7i in #1351 "The Policy config isn't a k8s resource (so you don't create it as a CRD). It is just a literal text file that you pass to the descheduler binary when it runs."
But this is difficult to understand from the README file and @damemi suggested "maybe we should put a small note in the readme to clarify that this is not a CRD".

It would be interesting for me to see an explanation of this design choice - looking like a CustomResource but mounted as a ConfigMap - but I see that as a bonus.

Cheers!

@Zalastax Zalastax added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant