-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is this a hack? #7
Comments
Hi Patrik, |
Ok, thanks :) So, if I understand it correctly, if mMusicCast would advertise itself as a chromecast v2 device, it would show up in every app that supports chromecast (including netflix, google music, spotify etc), and the reason why it currently does not is because it currently advertises as v1, and the mentioned apps need v2, right? If yes, this leads to the question, if an application that advertises itself as a chromecast v2 device can even be created, or if google locked down the api with v2 and you need a key or something to act as such a device. |
According to https://github.com/thibauts/node-castv2, it's not possible to act as a chromecast v2 device, because it would require googles private key. |
Actually it's pretty nice even just for Spotify alone. I wasn't able to have youtube work, but that's not a problem. Was not able to do it, but after seeing spotify accepts and plays music on it, after all that failures with different software and methods, it was kinda relief, thanks @vbaicu for the hope ;) |
I've been waiting very long for something like this to happen, but I always thought it was not possible to create a custom chromecast receiver and that Google locked down the API to prevent people from creating competing products.
I also thought that's why PiCAST does not act like a real chromecast, or why cheapcast had to stop.
But you did it, which leads me to the question: Is this a hack? Or was the API never locked down as I assumed?
Another question that comes to mind is: Why does it not automatically support all apps that chromecast supports, or, why do you have to support each app on its own? Isn't chromecast just a platform where apps can run their "receiver app" on? Or does google have to update their chromecast devices for every new app it supports?
I'd really like to find out more about how all of this works and what's the current situation. Do you mind to give me a short enlightenment on this?
If not, big big thanks to you anyway, as this is a huge step towards an open chromecast platform :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: