Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For parts of a triple, consider using "kinds" instead of "types" in primer #15

Open
kvistgaard opened this issue Aug 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Comments

@kvistgaard
Copy link

kvistgaard commented Aug 14, 2023

In the sentence

In the next three subsections, we discuss the three types of RDF data that occur in triples: IRIs, literals and blank nodes.

consider using "kinds of RDF data", instead of types to avoid confusion with types in the sense of datatypes and rdf:type , and to be consistent with sh:nodeKind.

The other issue in this statement, "three" instead of "four", is raised in #14
This makes it inconsistent with

There can be four kinds of nodes in an RDF graph: IRIs, literals, blank nodes, and quoted triples.

from RDF 1.2 Concepts and Abstract Syntax

@pfps pfps added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Jan 25, 2024
@pfps pfps changed the title For parts of a triple, consider using "kinds" instead of "types" For parts of a triple, consider using "kinds" instead of "types" in primer Jan 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants