Teach julia that NaNMath functions don't have effects

[oscardssmith]

This allows constant folding and dead code elimination on Julia 1.8 and up.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.08%. Comparing base (7e44d41) to head (e51a40a).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/NaNMath.jl	80.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #67      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.05%   97.08%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         136      137       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          132      133       +1     
  Misses          4        4              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ViralBShah]

I'm not the right person to review this.

[mlubin]

This needs a review from someone who understands @assume_effects

[oscardssmith]

I've talked to @vtjnash about this a bit and he thinks that libm might be leaking effectful information (rounding modes and signals) but I haven't been able to find observe this.

[vtjnash]

In particular, note that C documentation for these explicitly states these are not pure due to side effects.

[oscardssmith]

however the two areas of impurity (rounding modes and flags) appear not to be accessible from julia (or at least I haven't been able to observe the impurity)

[ChrisRackauckas]

@oscardssmith can you update this and drop the compat?

[ChrisRackauckas]

Actually that was simple enough. Looks right.