ENH: Add Hausman specification test

[eirki]

This adds the Hausman specification test, commonly used to choose between a fixed effects model and a random effects model. The function includes the options include_constant, sigmamore, and sigmaless - which mirrors Stata.

I haven't updated the documentation, but will be happy to do so if you want.

The function calculating an alternative covariance can perhaps be removed and replaced with adding a parameter to the covariance estimation.

I realize there is already a wu_hausman method for testing exogeneity in IV models, but I could not find a way to re-use it. Maybe the mathematics could be extracted into a shared function. Also I guess I should make the naming consistent.

Finally, I have written tests, but they do not look at the actual numerical results. Do you generally generate these using Stata and then test against them?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #249 (3bf7264) into main (556bde7) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #249      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.44%   99.38%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          88       88              
  Lines       15557    15647      +90     
  Branches     1528     1540      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        15470    15551      +81     
- Misses         38       41       +3     
- Partials       49       55       +6     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
linearmodels/panel/results.py	97.76% <100.00%> (-1.99%)	⬇️
linearmodels/tests/panel/_utility.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
linearmodels/tests/panel/test_results.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
linearmodels/panel/model.py	97.80% <0.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 556bde7...3bf7264. Read the comment docs.

[bashtage]

Should this be a method attached to a RandomEffectsResults class? This would likely simplify the calculations and logic. It also makes sure that we aren't trying to compare invalid models (e.g. a 2-way FE model with a RE model).

[eirki]

That's a good idea, I've moved it to a method.

I'm trying to generate test data using Stata, but the generated .do-file uses a stats command that I cannot find. Could you point me in the right direction?

[FeiYao-Edinburgh]

I will keep a big eye on this issue. Hausman tests for FE and RE deserves a add! Currently I need to calculate by myself based on the estimates of FE and RE.

[eirki]

I have now added tests against pre-calculated values from Stata. Let me know if anything needs to be changed/added!