Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable nullability in DesignerActionMethodItem #12676

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gpetrou
Copy link
Contributor

@gpetrou gpetrou commented Dec 23, 2024

Proposed changes

  • Enable nullability in DesignerActionMethodItem.
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@gpetrou gpetrou force-pushed the DesignerActionMethodItem branch from 909d588 to e03833e Compare December 23, 2024 11:44
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.43590% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.03455%. Comparing base (dba5d6e) to head (e03833e).
Report is 100 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##                main      #12676         +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage   76.03108%   76.03455%   +0.00346%     
===================================================
  Files           3181        3181                 
  Lines         639670      639700         +30     
  Branches       47215       47215                 
===================================================
+ Hits          486348      486393         +45     
+ Misses        149805      149788         -17     
- Partials        3517        3519          +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
Debug 76.03455% <97.43590%> (+0.00346%) ⬆️
integration 18.18598% <0.00000%> (+0.01182%) ⬆️
production 49.83430% <97.43590%> (+0.01126%) ⬆️
test 97.02634% <ø> (-0.00056%) ⬇️
unit 47.04919% <97.43590%> (+0.00383%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


public virtual bool IncludeAsDesignerVerb { get; }

public virtual void Invoke()
{
_methodInfo ??= _actionList?.GetType()?.GetMethod(MemberName, BindingFlags.Default | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
_methodInfo ??= _actionList?.GetType()?.GetMethod(MemberName!, BindingFlags.Default | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a comment explaining in detail why MemberName! can never be null.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can actually be null, but I did not want to add an extra exception to it.
@lonitra should I throw an exception instead?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's appropriate to add a more descriptive exception in this case. InvalidOperationException with message "Could not find method '{0}'."

@Tanya-Solyanik Tanya-Solyanik added the waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label Jan 7, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label Jan 11, 2025
@LeafShi1 LeafShi1 added the waiting-review This item is waiting on review by one or more members of team label Jan 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Files not reviewed (1)
  • src/System.Windows.Forms.Design/src/PublicAPI.Shipped.txt: Language not supported
@Tanya-Solyanik Tanya-Solyanik added waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author and removed waiting-review This item is waiting on review by one or more members of team labels Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-NRT waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants