Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(ci): Merge Lint Check Workflows into a Single Workflow checks.yml #873

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

usamaidrsk
Copy link
Member

@usamaidrsk usamaidrsk commented Jan 9, 2025

Notes for Reviewers

This PR fixes #783

Signed commits

  • Yes, I signed my commits.

Signed-off-by: Usama Idriss Kakumba <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the area/ci Continuous integration | Build and release label Jan 9, 2025
@usamaidrsk usamaidrsk requested a review from nebula-aac January 9, 2025 21:02
@usamaidrsk usamaidrsk self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@sudhanshutech sudhanshutech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nebula-aac do we need to test for each nodes 16, 18, 20. And if we should then could it be better if those three can also be checked at once and produce logs when either of it fails. Let us know you thoughts?

@@ -1,35 +1,41 @@
name: Checks
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@usamaidrsk will you rename this workflow to meaningful title please. Checks doesn't give idea to contributors what exactly the check is about.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/ci Continuous integration | Build and release
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[CI] Merge two separate workflows that does lint check
2 participants