Skip to content

[duckdb] Avro to SQL converter #3909

[duckdb] Avro to SQL converter

[duckdb] Avro to SQL converter #3909

Triggered via pull request January 11, 2025 00:51
Status Success
Total duration 11m 33s
Artifacts 19
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
10s
ValidateGradleWrapper
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

12 errors and 21 warnings
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fee006d3af0@403a5794 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736556998588, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fee006d3af0@be11a6 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736556998588, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736556998588, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736556998588, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fee006d3af0@7051f32b ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fee006d3af0@43a63f6e ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTim
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$594/0x00007f55fc5d24f8@5c6204e5 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736557121016, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736557121017, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$594/0x00007f55fc5d24f8@718858cb ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$594/0x00007f55fc5d24f8@513b2cda ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736557121016, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736557121017, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736557121017, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1",
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[0](AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fee006d3af0@403a5794 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736556998588, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fee006d3af0@be11a6 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736556998588, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736556998588, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736556998588, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fee006d3af0@7051f32b ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007fee006d3af0@43a63f6e ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_8d38165c9b_630bb59_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTim
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1623) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$594/0x00007f55fc5d24f8@5c6204e5 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736557121016, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736557121017, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$594/0x00007f55fc5d24f8@718858cb ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$594/0x00007f55fc5d24f8@513b2cda ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736557121016, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736557121017, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736557121017, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_a9b8c67f49_8204b7b1_v1",
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4248) However, there were exactly 22749 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:615) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:629) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:576) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:638) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 2101174947 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1629) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1546) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 2101174947 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736556929709}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 2101174947 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1919) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736556929709} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2164) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latest
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4248) However, there were exactly 22749 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:615) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:629) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:576) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:638) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 2101174947 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1629) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1546) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 2101174947 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736556929709}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 2101174947 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1919) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736556929709} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2164) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_7634dccd46_932fc009_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latest
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4248) However, there were exactly 29327 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:615) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:629) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:576) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:638) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 975191803 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1629) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1546) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 975191803 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736557028217}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 975191803 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1919) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736557028217} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2164) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1,
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4248) However, there were exactly 29327 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:615) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:629) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:576) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:638) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 975191803 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1629) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1546) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 975191803 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736557028217}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 975191803 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1919) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736557028217} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2164) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_8d34baa22b_ba926287_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1,
ValidateGradleWrapper
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
StaticAnalysis (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Controller / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Router / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Controller / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Router / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Controller / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Router / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Internal / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Internal / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Internal / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Server / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Clients / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Clients / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Clients / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size
StaticAnalysis
643 KB
clients-jdk11
2.55 MB
clients-jdk17
2.56 MB
clients-jdk8
2.49 MB
controller-jdk11
1.33 MB
controller-jdk17
1.34 MB
controller-jdk8
1.33 MB
integrations-jdk11
506 KB
integrations-jdk17
514 KB
integrations-jdk8
495 KB
internal-jdk11
3.06 MB
internal-jdk17
3.07 MB
internal-jdk8
3.04 MB
router-jdk11
1.04 MB
router-jdk17
1.03 MB
router-jdk8
1.03 MB
server-jdk11
9.06 MB
server-jdk17
9.01 MB
server-jdk8
8.89 MB